Per person, Germany has used as much from nature in just over four months as can be regenerated in the space of a year

Germany has used more resources in the first third of 2022 than are sustainably available to it for an entire year. Anne-Sophie Brändlin explains in an article on the Deutsche Welle website what needs to change.

 

German Overshoot Day: ‘We cannot continue like this’

It is only the beginning of May, but already Germany’s Overshoot Day. In other words, per person, the country has used as much from nature in just over four months as can be regenerated in the space of a year.

If people across the world lived like those in Germany, we would need three planets to cater to them. Though clearly, we only have one.

“That should be an alarm signal to remind us of the gravity of the situation,” said Lara Louisa Siever, senior policy advisor for resource justice at the German development network INKOTA. “It’s a wakeup call to all of us citizens, but also politicians and industry, that we cannot continue like this.”

Calculated by international reasearch group, Global Footprint Network, Overshoot Day factors in how much we consume, how efficiently products are made, population size and how much nature can reproduce.

Germany’s early Overshoot Day is down to its intensive use of resources in areas such as agriculture and energy inefficiency in buildings, says Stefan Küper, press spokesperson for the environmental and sustainable development NGO Germanwatch.

“And this leads to Germany living on credit and taking a lot more from the planet than we are supposed to,” he said.

Progress too slow

It is not the first time Germany has depleted its resources so quickly. In fact, the country’s official Overshoot Day has been close to the same date for years.

“And that’s the saddest part. We don’t see enough movement in Germany. We are clearly not making any real, measurable progress towards using less resources or emitting fewer greenhouse gasses,” Küper said, adding it sends the wrong signal to other countries that might be looking at Germany to see how it is tackling the problem of emissions.

“What they see is that Germany isn’t really making any progress in reaching its climate goals. So they’ll think it’s not a priority for them either.”

Against that backdrop, he says Germany has to “take giant, measurable steps to show it didn’t only set goals, but is doing something to reach them.”

High-income countries live at the cost of low-income nations

Despite reaching its Overshoot Day so early in the year, Germany is by no means the first country to cross the dubious finishing line. Other high-income states including Qatar, Luxembourg, Canada, the United Arab Emirates and the United States got there even sooner.

A fact that Siever says underscores how industrialized countries are living off the backs of low-income nations, such as Jamaica, Ecuador, Indonesia, Cuba and Iraq, which use fewer resources and will not reach their respective Overshoot Days until the end of the year.

“Germany is the fifth biggest consumer of raw materials in the world and is importing minerals and metals to 99% from countries in the Global South,” Siever said. “These countries don’t consume the same amount of raw materials, but are the ones bearing the costs; the human rights degradation and environmental damages.”

Earth Overshoot Day across the decades

Half a century ago, the Earth’s biocapacity was more than enough to meet annual human demand for resources. But ‘Earth Overshoot Day’, the date when humanity as a whole has used up the resources needed to live sustainably for a year, has been creeping up the calendar for a long time.

For this year, the date hasn’t been announced yet, but it landed on August 22 in 2020. In 1970 and 1990, it fell on December 30 and October 10 respectively. By 2010, it had moved forward to August 6.

“That’s what worries me so much, that we have been overusing our resources for decades, and that globally speaking, we are seeing an increasing level of overuse,” Küper said. “It’s a development that we need to stop immediately.”

What needs to change?

Among the main culprits for overshooting the planet’s natural budget are carbon emissions, which currently make up 60% of humanity’s ecological footprint. If we were to emit just half that, we would hit Earth Overshoot Day about three months later.

Transitioning to renewable energy is one of the most powerful ways to cut emissions, but Siever says we also have to be aware of the raw material value chains involved.

“Everybody is asking for a renewable energy transition. But we need minerals and metals for this, such as cobalt, lithium and nickel. What we often forget is that the processing of these minerals and metals contribute 11% to global CO2 emissions,” she said.

She is working with civil society to push for a raw materials transition that would see us use far fewer of them, and is encouraged by the fact that the German government included a plan to reduce its raw materials usage in its coalition treaty.

Shaping a sustainable future

Many citizen initiatives, municipal policies and business strategies are already driving change that could ultimately impact when Germany hits it Overshoot Day in the future.

In the western German city of Wuppertal, citizens initiatied a project to transform an old railroad into a bike path network, which is expected to be used by 90 million cyclists over the next 30 years.

Not far away, in the city of Aachen, policymakers laid the strategic foundation for a climate-neutral city by 2030. The surface area of Aachen’s roofs eligible to support photovoltaic systems is large enough to meet the electricity demand of all inhabitants. The financing of 150 rooftop solar installations has already been secured, with another 1000 to be initiated this year.

Küper believes such shifts are down to citizen initiatives like Fridays for Future putting pressure on politicians and demanding change. And he says dates such as Earth Overshoot Day play an important role in raising the alarm across the world.

“When we started raising awareness of this day with other organizations, hardly anyone knew about it. Now I see a massive growth in public awareness of the day and the problems it represents. And we need that. Without public pressure, nothing is going to change as fast as we need it to,”  Küper said.

External link

4 thoughts on “Per person, Germany has used as much from nature in just over four months as can be regenerated in the space of a year

  1. This is a very good article. There are a wide range of reasons why German-like countries need 3 Earths but I will drill down on one: marketing and the desire by companies to sell to people things they do not need. Once-upon-a-time a company called Rover invented a 4 wheel drive vehicle aimed, mostly at farmers and organisations that needed to travel over very rough terrain – they called it a “Land Rover”. Until the mid-1980s it was a utility vehicle. They (Land-Rover) then “invented” a up-market vehicle & called it a Range Rover. By the mid-1990s the German OEMs were casting covetous eyes at the Range Rove profit margins and the rest is history. Gas guzzling (because heavy) unstable (due to height), expensive to insure (due to height and cost) etc etc .Made no difference, the German OEMs still sell loads to groomed sheep/serfs/citizens. Whilst at the same time, doing their bit to use up a bit more of the planet.

    On a regular basis I cycle on the road in the countryside in the south of Brussels – & there are loads of SUVs driven by groomed imbeciles, who will never drive off-road but have been convinced that they need one. Few years back, on a mountain bike ride on a track, I came across a convoy of these dolts, on an MTB route I usually take. They were all stuck (on a route I struggle to get through on an MTB – what a surprise). I asked one of the morons what he was doing? The answer was “leisure activity” or some such. Where is the A10 Thunderbolt when you need one? – honestly!

    1. It is easy to blame the companies that make and market. I put the blame on the consumers. They gave a choice and are bot forced to buy these products. The answer is not to switch to renewables. the only answer is to cut consumption. That will require a lot of education and convincing. And a lot of laws and government action. One way to force change is to cut down amount of oil and coal extracted. Starve the beast. Zoning laws also. But that requires education and convincing votes and government officials that drastic change is needed. In the meantime we keep drifting toward the cliff that we will eventually fall off. That downfall fall will be very painful.

      1. You explain it well. We simply have to cut consumption. Starving the beast is essential for many reasons.

Leave a Reply to Mike Parr Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.