“Building a passive house was the best decision we ever made”

Arlene Harris writes on the Irish section of The Times website about the positive aspects of having a passive house. What is your experience?

 

Passivhaus concept isn’t a load of hot air

Parents of teenagers will recognise how irritating it can be when their children take long showers and use up all the hot water. This isn’t a problem for Mel Reynolds, because his four teens could shower for up to one hour and 10 minutes between them before the hot water costs him a cent.

This amazing trickery is down to the fact that not only does his house have an official passive house rating, as monitored by the Passive House Institute (PHI), but it has also just received the first “passive plus” accreditation in Ireland.

Built last year and in the process of being sold, the 120 sq m house in Sandycove is an ultra-low energy house which doesn’t require a primary heating system, yet remains at a constant 21C downstairs and 18C upstairs all year round. There is also an endless supply of hot water and pure fresh air circulating around the property at all times.

As if this were not enough, Reynolds gets up to 10,000 km of driving a year powered by the excess energy produced by the solar panels on his roof.

“I was somewhat cynical [about the possible benefits] before monitoring things and I have to say, I was amazed,” says the architect. “But the biggest difference between this house and a regular house is the air quality — it was astonishing to us to have this gorgeous fresh air circulating around all the time. It was a bit like the feeling you get when you breathe in country air and sleep like a log because the air quality is so good.

“Both my wife and my son are mildly asthmatic, so this has been great for them. The temperature is also fantastic. The heating is managed by using the heat from the kitchen and bathroom to preheat fresh air which is coming into the house — so we are getting 100% pre-warmed pure air. It is hygiene-ventilated, which is reassuring during Covid.”

Reynolds says building a house to the PHI standards was marginally cheaper than building a home with an A3 building energy rating, and his energy bills are coming in at a staggeringly low €300 a year. While Reynolds’s house is at the top end of the scale, architect Darragh Lynch reveals that there are different ways in which to achieve a passive house rating.

“A [generic] passive house uses passive measures to create a comfortable home that uses very little energy,” he says. “This is based on using low-tech, good building practices to achieve good results. It is not clearly defined and there are no specific metrics associated with it.

“The PHI passive house or Passivhaus was defined by Wolfgang Feist, a building physicist in Germany. He was trying to work out what the optimal level of insulation in a house would be and plotted a curve of energy saved against building costs. As he increased the level of insulation, more and more energy was saved, but he reached a point where the cost of the insulation became more expensive than the energy saved because the amount of energy required to heat the house was so small.”

At a particular point the energy required to heat the house no longer needed a conventional heating system, according to Lynch. “This was the point where he set the Passivhaus standard.”

Since then, this standard has been recognised globally and is supported by various research institutes. According to Lynch, based in Dublin, there is no one-size-fits-all method as the certification is based on meeting performance criteria which are tried and tested on site.

“The classic Passivhaus is heated by the operation of the ventilation system. However, in some cases, supplementary heating may be required,” says Lynch.

Tomás O’Leary of MosArt Architecture says the first passive house in the English-speaking world to measure up to the PHI definition was built by his company in Wicklow in 2004. He has been involved in design, delivery and education relating to the PHI-rated concept ever since.

He defines the rating as a “super-efficient energy performance standard”.

“It provides year-round comfort, incredible indoor air quality and tiny heating bills,” he says. “And it’s achieved through doing the basic things really, really well — so, continuous insulation without breaks, completely draught-proof, no thermal bridges, glazed windows and a mechanical ventilation system which recovers heat from the exhaust air taken from bathrooms and kitchen.”

Although it was developed 30 years ago, Feist’s Passivhaus still exceeds normal building regulations.

“If you build to the PHI passive house standard, you can be sure that your project is future-proofed in terms of efficiency, comfort and indoor air quality,” says O’Leary. “The home we built in 2004 measures 4,000 sq ft and costs just €250 a year to heat. Covid-19 has taught us a valuable lesson in terms of changing the air in our homes regularly, and with [a] passive house, the air is changed multiple times a day and is filtered and tempered, making it a much more healthy indoor environment.”

Hugh Wallace, presenter of RTE’s The Great House Revival and judge on Home of the Year, believes not enough people are considering energy levels in their houses and this is something which needs to change.

“Some 70% of homes in Ireland are below a C rating in terms of their energy efficiency, which is appalling,” says Wallace of Douglas Wallace Consultants. “But new houses have to be built to a very high energy standard. The question is how we refit the million-and-a-half properties that don’t get a B or A rating.”

The architect says there are obstacles surrounding the retrofitting of homes and a lack of grant support. “To achieve maximum grant aid, you have to go for the maximum A rating,” he says. “That means that a retrofit will cost somewhere between €60,000 to €100,000. The government gives 30% grants, so retrofitting is only for the wealthy. It needs to be for the people who aren’t wealthy, because they’re the ones who will benefit the most.

“I believe they should be going for a B rating. This will, in my opinion, have the most benefit in terms of the level of insulation achieved, the running cost and the benefits to the environment.”

Cost is usually cited as the biggest obstacle to measuring up to a passive house rating, but O’Leary thinks the benefits far outweigh any negatives.

“About five or six years ago, it was quite expensive to get the components needed for [a] passive house, such as triple-glazed windows and heat recovery ventilation,” he says. “But with the arrival of Nzeb, the nearly zero-energy building standard, in Ireland last year, these products are now commonly available and so the cost uplift for building a passive house is negligible. We’ve built several passive house projects that cost the same or even less than so-called normal construction.

“My advice to anyone considering this route would be to do research and find out everything there is to know about it. Seek professional advice from experienced people to see if it is right for you. Building a passive house was the best decision we ever made. My wife summarised it very well recently when she said, ‘Living in this house is like being away’ — and that’s 14 years later.”

External link

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.