More action needed to meet energy goals by 2030, new report finds

Deutsche Welle, Germany’s international broadcaster, reports on a new report from the World Bank that highlights that efforts to provide clean energy to the poor are not meeting their goals and that a greater effort is needed.


Getting clean power to the poor hits a bump

A fresh report by the World Bank and the International Energy Agency has revealed there’s been little progress in providing clean energy to the poor. The survey identified a lack of political leadership.

Around one in seven people – just over 1 billion – still had no access to electricity, a new tracking report by the World Bank and the International Energy Agency (IEA) pointed out Monday in citing figures that had barely improved in two years.

Data for 2012 to 2014 clearly showed that progress in providing clean, modern energy to the poor was losing the race against population growth, especially in rural areas.

“If we are to make access to clean, affordable and reliable energy a reality, we’re going to have to drive the rate of progress up and that is going to require political leadership,” said Rachel Kyte, CEO of Sustainable Energy for All.

A costly affair

The report said that universal access to modern energy and rapidly increasing the share of renewables in the global energy mix were fundamental to achieving other goals linked to ending poverty and boosting healthcare and education.

“Every day we delay, or every day we don’t deliver, it becomes more painful and expensive, and we risk losing people and leaving people behind,” Kyte told reporters.

The survey noted that in Africa, excluding the north, only 37 percent of people had electricity, compared with a global rate of 85 percent. Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo even saw their rates fall in the two-year period under review.

More positively, the report showed that some of the world’s largest energy-consuming nations – Australia, China, Italy, Mexico, Nigeria, Russia and Britain – cut their energy intensity as a measure of efficiency by more than 2 percent annually.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.