France’s ban on short-haul flights with rail alternative endorsed by European Commission

Climate campaigners tentatively welcome the move but say that it is still ‘baby steps’ in battle to cut carbon dioxide emissions in France. Rebecca Rosman discusses the ban in an article on The Telegraph website. Which country is next?


France ban on short-haul domestic flights with a rail alternative approved by Brussels

France is banning short-haul domestic flights when there is a rail alternative that takes less than two and a half hours.

The ban, which has been greenlit by Brussels, will put an end to flights between Paris Orly Airport and the cities of Nantes, Bordeaux, and Lyon.

The final number of axed flights stops short of the eight routes French lawmakers had proposed to cut.

The European Commission, which was given the final say on the law, decided the ban could only take place on routes that offered several direct connections in each direction every day.

If rail services improve, three more routes could be added – between Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport and Lyon and Rennes,  and between Lyon and Marseille.

“This is a major step forward and I am proud that France is a pioneer in this area,” Clément BeauneFrance’s transport minister, said in an emailed statement following the commission’s approval of the measure.

Climate activists and Green party politicians similarly welcomed the ban, but said it was a “baby step” in the larger fight against climate change and reducing carbon dioxide emissions in Europe.

“The French ban on short-haul flights where quick train connections exist is a baby step, but it’s one in the right direction,” said Thomas Gelin, Greenpeace’s EU climate campaigner.

Karima Delli, a French Green MEP, applauded the commission’s decision as a “victory”, but said the legislation should have been extended to cover flights that could be replaced by a four-hour train journey.

It will still take several months for the ban to come into force.

Some European lawmakers hope the law will expand to routes across the continent as new high-speed rail lines, as part of the EU’s TEN-T project, are being constructed.

While the current rail journey between Paris and Milan, for example, takes more than 7 hours, the opening of the new 36-mile-long Mont Cenis Base Tunnel will cut the journey time in half.

External link

2 thoughts on “France’s ban on short-haul flights with rail alternative endorsed by European Commission

  1. Whilst excellent news, the caveats still being imposed by the European Commission( para 4) remain deeply worrying.
    Twenty years ago, as a member of the then European Commissioners’ permanent advisory committee, I was asked to prepare a policy paper on options to reduce climate emissions from European aviation.
    One of my proposals was to ban short haul aviation journeys where there are viable rail alternatives. I vividly recall the director general, Francois Lamoueux, telling me that this concept would never be approved by the European Commission, as it would be in breach on internal trade grounds.
    Sounds as though that too much of that prejudice still prevails.

    1. Thanks so much, Andrew, for this background information. Let’s hope someone out there will deal with those caveats. But I assume you are right about the prejudice still prevailing. Maybe the experience in France will give some confidence to others. France does have the advantage of very “viable rail alternatives.” But many others also do.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.