New analysis shows that 16 out of 27 member states are still financing fossil fuel heating, despite calls to phase out gas boilers by 2025 to achieve EU climate neutrality goals. These dirty subsidies cripple the deployment of clean heating technologies such as heat pumps and solar thermal devices.
This year, only seven countries – Croatia, Estonia, Ireland, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands, – have cut off public funding to gas, coal and oil heating, as the latest analysis by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) on behalf of Coolproducts campaign shows.
Findings reveal that 16 EU governments still incentivise the purchase and/or installation of new gas boilers through various tax reductions, loans and grants, which range between €200 and €2,500 and are supposedly aimed at greening our homes. Moreover, 9 are still promoting oil heating and there are still 2 of them where coal heating can still be subsidised.
Time is running out for the EU to decarbonise the heating sector, which is the easiest and the most urgent to decarbonise as it is responsible for half of the EU’s annual energy consumption and a third of its CO2 emissions.
A month ago, the International Energy Agency endorsed one of the main claims of Coolproducts: we will not reach climate neutrality by 2050 if we do not ban fossil fuel boilers by 2025. The European Parliament recently voted for pushing EU member states to end fossil fuel subsidies by 2025.
A recent report of ECOS for the coolproducts campaign showed fossil heating technologies face bans only in a few member states and concludes that this process can only gain momentum if the European institutions speed up the decarbonisation process.
Even major EU energy groups recently called on the EU to favour decarbonisation through electrification of heating over fossil fuel solutions, arguing that heat pumps can be deployed on a large scale in Europe without jeopardising electric grid stability, a false argument that the gas lobby has been spreading.
Despite these winds of change over the sector, boosted by the launch of the ‘Fit for 55’ package, EU governments are not doing their part in the decarbonisation of heating. The slow uptake of clean heating at national level, namely the huge amounts of fossil fuel subsidies reducing the cost of gas heating, and the slow insulation rates in some countries are hindering the huge potential of renewables.
Money for nothing, pollute for free
In this report, we have compared families that have one average wage for a full-time employee of each country and the affordability, if the family pays 5% of the income for the investment. Findings are very illustrative:
- In Belgium, Italy and Slovakia the payback time for a gas boiler can be zero as incentives can reach 100%.
- France finances all kinds of clean heating devices, from heat pumps to solar thermal heaters, but also fossil fuel boilers. Consequently, the payback time for the purchase of a heat pump can be 6 times longer than the one of gas boiler
- Belgium and France are the only countries that are still subsidizing fossil heating technology which they have already committed to ban soon from the market.
Most EU countries support in one way or another the installation of renewable energy for heating in the form of heat pumps and solar heating, but the study reveals that no member state managed to even the payback time of the technology purchase of gas boilers and heat pumps. Some schemes are only open for a short time and have quite limited budgets.
What the EU can do
Coolproducts campaigners call on EU to:
- Urgently rescale energy label of heating technologies to only promote renewable, non-emitting heating and phase out fossil technologies by 2025.
- Strengthen the provisions in the RED III on renewable heating, requiring a high share of renewable to promote the least emitting sources.
and remarkably, in the Fit For 55 package:
- Strengthen the provisions in the RED II on renewable heating, requiring a high share of renewable to promote the least emitting sources
- Improve measures on the public support for the phase out of fossil fuel in the Energy Efficiency Directive
Facts and figures
- 16 out 27 member states today still finance gas boilers, 8 oil boilers and 2 still fund coal boilers.14 EU governments finance hybrid solutions that combine both fossil and renewable heating.
- In all member states, analysis show ground-source heat pumps working on electricity from the grid largely decrease CO2 emissions.
- At EU level, a standard family switching from a gas boiler to a heat pump or to solar thermal heating can save more than 60% of the CO2 emissions
- The final purchase cost of fossil technology is still lower than renewable heating technology due to fossil incentives and poor subsidy schemes for renewables in all EU countries.
- Germany, Ireland, Spain and Finland are the countries where heat pump installation is more affordable but still more than twice as expensive as fossil boilers.
- Renewable schemes are very different from country to country and often difficult to get or time-limited, thus creating disproportionate gaps in treatments of households willing to embrace renewables
- Heat pumps with low Global Warming Potential refrigerants perform better on CO2 emissions and are to be preferred over those working on climate-harming refrigerants
The full analysis is available here.