British engineering group Dyson going to court over EU energy labels

James Dyson has had an on-going battle with the EU over minimum energy performance standards and energy labels. Now he feels that the current energy labelling scheme gives an unfair advantage to rivals. James Titcomb explains in The Telegraph.


Dyson heads to European court over vacuum cleaner energy labels

Dyson will fight an EU court battle over Brussels’ energy efficiency rules later this month, arguing the current regime allows rival vacuum cleaner makers to mislead consumers.

The British engineering group, best known for its bagless vacuum cleaners, believes the existing EU rules puts the company at an unfair disadvantage, since energy labels does not take into account whether ­rivals’ products are tested for energy efficiency with a new or used bag.

It argues that unlike its own products, bag-based vacuum cleaners consume much more power outside of laboratory conditions, but are allowed to provide “Class A” energy ratings that do not reflect how they perform in the home.

On October 26, Dyson will go to the ­European Court of Justice (ECJ) in a case against Bosch Siemens. It claims the company is misleading customers by not specifying that energy efficiency tests are done in laboratory conditions.

Dyson says the vacuum cleaners ­made by Bosch and Siemens consume significantly more power under normal use, once dust is in the bag, than under the conditions used to test its energy efficiency. Bosch and Siemens parent company BSH Home Appliances has countersued on defamation grounds.

The case was originally brought in Belgium but escalated to the European Court last year. Arguments will be heard later this month, although a decision is not expected for some time.

Dyson, which says it has invested £350m in researching and developing digital motors, is fighting a separate case in Europe claiming that the energy tests themselves are unfair and should be changed. In 2015 the EU General Court ­dismissed its bid to change the tests, but Dyson was given a lifeline in May when it successfully appealed against the decision.

The ECJ ordered the lower court to take into account a “deeper assessment of the evidence”. At the time Dyson called it a “rare and historic win for consumers”.

Last week, Dyson replaced its chief executive, Max Conze, with Jim Rowan, its chief operating officer. The move comes at a critical juncture for the company, which has just announced plans to build an electric car in 2020.

Sir James Dyson, the company’s founder, said last month he would ­invest £2bn in a “radical” new car ­design that is being built from scratch. As part of the plans, the company will open a new testing facility in the UK on a former RAF base in Wiltshire.

Dyson did not comment while BSH could not be reached for comment.

One thought on “British engineering group Dyson going to court over EU energy labels

  1. I think that Sir James Dyson is making an extremely important point here. The problem is that, in his native Britain, anti-EU politicians seized upon his complaint as a key Brexit argument that all European energy efficiency standards are stupid. I do hope that he will even now use his respected position as one of Europe’s most innovative manufacturers to extract his campaign from being overwhelmed by such nihilistic bedfellows.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.