Changing behaviour to promote energy efficiency could be more effective according to new analysis

Improving energy efficiency is addressed in many ways. Changing consumer behaviour is essential and the IEA’s Demand Side Management Energy Efficiency certainly is doing its best to help the cause. Here we have the Global-Action-Plan explain on the Blue & green tomorrow website that current programmes could be more effective if 80% of them focused more on making energy saving actions easier for building users at the outset. What do you think?

 

New Report Shows Energy Efficiency Campaigns Are Missing a Trick

Only one in five energy efficiency behaviour change programmes actively identifies and removes barriers to change, suggesting that all too often building occupants may not be getting the help they need to act energy efficiently. That is the surprise finding from the latest issue of the UK Energy Efficiency Trends report (Volume 13) produced and published by EEVS and Bloomberg New Energy Finance in association with Global Action Plan in January 2016.

The report provides evidence that no cost/low cost behaviour change programmes could be more effective if 80% of them focused more on making energy saving actions easier for building users at the outset.

The latest EEVS UK Energy Efficiency Trends report covers Q3 of 2015. It includes a dataset to help shed light on what constitutes a behaviour change programme and the impacts the initiatives are making on the ground. The research found that savings could be increased by using more behavioural levers and that while the breadth of communications was good, savings could be increased further if suppliers better understood organisational barriers to potential change.

With two decades of behaviour change experience, these issues are well understood by Global Action Plan.

“Successful behaviour change requires a solution that suits the local audience, desired actions, available communication methods and organisational culture. One size does not fit all,” explained Chris Large, Senior Partner at Global Action Plan.

“The report shows the trend in engagement activities to be positive. There is a broad split between the different ways of reaching occupants, including the use of online and hard copy communications, senior lead messaging, face to face conversations, energy training and recruiting energy champions. This suggests energy teams are selecting methods that are right for their situation.

“However, the trend in the use of behavioural levers leaves room for improvement.

“Unlike engagement activities, it is good practice to use certain behavioural levers in most situations. Two behavioural levers are under-used. Identifying and removing barriers to change is a lever that overcomes whatever stops people being energy efficient. This is happening in less than 1 in 5 programmes run by energy teams, suggesting that occupants frequently may not be getting all the help they need to act energy efficiently. For example, if a bank of light switches in a shared office is not labelled, staff may hesitate to turn out the light for fear of plunging their colleagues into darkness.

“The other lever that is under used is emphasising the ‘other benefits’ that energy efficiency brings beyond cost and carbon savings. Emphasising benefits to occupants has proven highly successful – such as in hospitals where the benefits of using natural light and lights-out curfews in helping patients to sleep was highly motivating to nurses.

“Often, this emphasis on occupant benefits is crucial, as leading with the savings may not align with building occupants’ core motivations. For example, nurses are likely to care most about their patients’ well-being, not energy bills and so encouraging nurses to remember to switch out the light is more powerful if the motivation is to help their patients rest and recover.

“The survey shows energy teams favour the savings message 70% of the time, but only communicate ‘other benefits’ 25% of the time. If projects were to more frequently promote all benefits and to also help occupants overcome their barriers to change, savings from projects could be higher,” he concluded.

EET1

Compiled from the results of a confidential, quarterly industry survey, the UK Energy Efficiency Trends Report clearly evidences industry trends and has become one of the sector’s leading sources of market intelligence. The report covers both energy suppliers and consumers, providing differentiated results for each market sector.

The report is delivered by a research partnership between EEVS and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, and supported by Bird & Bird, Bellrock and Schneider Electric.

4 thoughts on “Changing behaviour to promote energy efficiency could be more effective according to new analysis

  1. Whilst this analysis makes sense, it is simply echoing research undertaken twenty, even thirty, years ago. The conclusions of which were sadly almost entirely ignored.

    • You’re right but it seems as if this generation needs to re-visit everything. The conclusions were ignored in the 1980s. The drop in oil prices in 1986, in particular, led to a level of complacency in such research that it was essentially shelved for far too long. It is encouraging to see what is going on now and hopefully they will catch up to where things stood 30 years ago.

  2. Given that the world has now returned to the level of oil prices experienced in 1986, which you suggest was a primary cause for the abandonment of the lessons which similar earlier research offered, I admire your optimism that this generation will not make the same fundamental mistakes too!

    • I am an optimist but fully expect this generation to make mistakes. But, I feel we are reaching a tipping point in the wider public and decision makers giving energy efficiency a higher priority. I understand the UK government has abandoned some programmes and hope that will be rectified. It is encouraging that the European Commission is considering the 40% scenario more seriously and that they will be revising the EE directives in a more ambitious light. I don’t want “energy efficiency first” to simply be a slogan. I want it to be taken seriously. And for that we still have a lot of work ahead of us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s